The results gained from thinking turn into culture when they are exchanged among each other. Analytical and logical thinking processes lead to a circumspect reality.

The thinking process of humans is however oftentimes not optimized, the provided gift of creation to freedom of choice is made primarily in favour of one’s own ego. Identity is more than intuitively solve one’s needs, they reflect a personality to the outside world which includes values, attitude and actions.

Irreversibleness of reciprocal exchange for the improvement of culture has to be determined towards being implemented in the right spot to support the society.

In line with the old adage…

All nature, all formations, all creatures exist in and with one another, and they will be resolved again into their own (today’s and viewable world period) to preserve the nature on our blue planet.

No child of nature would throw its garbage into its water reservoir. We are responsible for creating the environmental pollution which we are now experiencing. Are we to hand over a destroyed planet to our children?

A statement, a quote that has continuously motivated me to get up and start over new.

Fellow people still do not understand the necessity to not only encourage inventions for the environment but to also support and realize them.

The inventor is continuously described as a source of ideas, which, however is principally wrong.

The inventor devises, thinks through and calculates his inventions. He does not want to leave anything to chance and puts himself into his inventions for a moment as if he was a part of it. As an element he passes through all systems, a necessity for the optimization process. This is the first phase of an invention.

Concepts of inventions are being laughed at and ridiculed time and again. Renowned research institutes mock the inventor with their know-all attitude ‘we have professors, doctors and engineers – your concept can never work’ which oftentimes endangered the project. Statements like this are constant companions during the first phase.

The second phase, the execution of the invention by developing a prototype to prove the functionality of the system, eventually put me in the position of a beggar. ‘Risk capital’ is a man-made term to change the inventor in favour of the financier. This fact restricts inventive creativity.

In the transition to the third phase, if a successful execution of one’s project has been realized, this is not being recognized or acknowledged. By providing a faultless testing phase and confirmation of the functionality, the inventor experiences a lot of envy and resentment.

A genuine scientist however has a completely different perspective, words such as pleonexia, vindictiveness, greed, avarice, greed for money, and hunger for profit are foreign words to him. Of course he has to earn money, also based on the fundamentals that it can realize further research projects.

In the end either both sides come to a positive agreement or the invention is lost, - at the disadvantage for mankind. The copying or the theft of the intellectual property are highly negative characteristics of a particular species of human beings.

‘To understand a new technology one has to understand its process.

It is not enough to copy a machine’

The Environmentalist

This way I not only experienced envy, hate and sabotage after completing my latest project but was also subjected to large financial losses caused by third parties which were not reimbursed. Or is this an attempt to remove an unconventional thinker from the market by means of an artificially created insolvency?

It takes an exceptional strength of character to endure such procedures, which have become usualness for inventors.

Although only shortly mentioned it should also clearly be point out:

There are few good people who continuously motivate and financially support inventions and thereby lead them to success.

God bless.